THEME:
Film Shorts
Call for Entries
Short
student films on any topic should be submitted by the film teacher
before the competition deadline. Provide a link to the video or send the file to the CGAC 22 DropBox.
GUIDELINES:
All submitted projects should have appropriate release forms signed by participants.
SUBMISSIONS:
Use an advanced desktop video editing package. Save your video as an MP4 file.
Once invited to
the Finals, bring your team to pitch your film to a panel of judges in a 5 minute presentation.
See the Finals rubrics at the lower right.
ASSESSMENT:
Originality of image and concept, adherence to industry standards, good use of technology. Please keep the running length to 5 minutes or less
.
2024 Citywide Graphic Arts Competition Rubric
Student Filmmakers / Qualifying Round
CATEGORY Value: |
10 |
7 |
3 |
0
|
Concept
|
Theme(s) are expressed in a creative manner. Ideas are thoroughly explored. Information is organized and presented creatively |
Theme(s) are clear. |
Themes are unclear. |
Themes are unclear. |
Lighting
|
Additional lighting has been used consistently to
eliminate shadows and glares. |
Additional lighting has been used, but may not be set up optimally. Cameras are set to the appropriate light level. |
Cameras are set to appropriate light level, but no additional lighting was used when needed. Avoids backlighting subject. |
Cameras are not set to appropriate light level. Additional lighting may, or may not, be used. Shots have windows or sun behind subject. |
Shot variety and usage |
Shots are well organized The purpose and/or message of
the project is clearly discernable. |
Shots indicate a basic purpose. |
Shots indicate a basic purpose. |
Shots lack a basic purpose. |
Narration / Dialogue |
Good pace and innovative use of Narration / Dialogue.
|
Narration / Dialogue has a good pace to match visuals. |
Narration / Dialogue rushes through or drags behind on
screen images. |
There is no Narration / Dialogue |
Software
|
Extensive and appropriate use of advanced features of non linear editing software.
|
Extensive but inapproriate use of advanced features of non linear editing software.. |
Limited or rudimentary use of advanced features of non linear editing software. |
No use of advanced features of non linear editing software. |
Student
Filmmakers /
Finals
Rubric for Presentation
CATEGORY Value: |
10 |
7 |
3 |
0
|
Concept
|
Team has a clear picture of what they are trying to achieve. Each member can describe what they are trying to do and generally how his/her work will contribute to the final product. |
Team has a fairly clear picture of what they are trying to achieve. Each member can describe what they are trying to do overall but has trouble describing how his/her work will contribute to the final product. |
Team has brainstormed their concept, but no clear focus has emerged for the team. Team members may describe the goals/final product differently. |
Team has spent little effort on brainstorming and refining a concept. Team members are unclear on the goals and how their contributions will help them reach the goal. |